This is very essential, perhaps even the most essential criteria in regard to the question if a determined spiritual teaching is authentic and believable. A spiritual teaching is authentic until there is no big money and/or wealthy power involved with it. As soon as big money or wealthy power gets involved we are talking about a business, a game, a business game, a power game, instead of a spiritual teaching.
..
=============================================
A spiritual teaching is authentic until there is no big money or wealthy power involved. =============================================
3. This was not the case with scientology founder Ron Hubbard, since money [and big business] was involved since from the beginning + even though no physical violence, hatred or discrimination has never been preached, there have been adopted psychological pressures on 'apostates'.
Conclusion: Islam and scientology are clearly NOT AUTHENTIC TEACHINGS since from the first moment on.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
=============================================
A spiritual teaching is authentic until there is no big money or wealthy power involved.
=============================================
1. This was the case with Jesus Christ, Buddha, Krishna, Baha'ullah, Nanak Dev Ji, Rama&Sita and other great teachers, which have given us examples of pureness, honesty, believability, peace and common sense. As soon as man-made religious institutions have been built, the original teachings have been distorted for the sake of the institutions own power interests.
=============================================
A spiritual teaching is authentic until there is no big money or wealthy power involved. =============================================
2. This was not the case with Mohammedanism. The founder Muhammad who's first wifes 'Khadija' or 'Khadeejah' company name was Islam [which he inherited] until he got the idea with the religion and all the power and wealthy advantages coming along, so big money [business] and wealthy power has not only be involved since from the beginning, but has even been the basis for the whole story while his alleged "religion" contributed to the grow of his business and wealthy power, and was a demagogic justification tool for his unthinkable deeds, atrocities, wars of conquests, discriminations, subjugations, morders, beheading, stoning, threats, etc..
A spiritual teaching is authentic until there is no big money or wealthy power involved.
=============================================
1. This was the case with Jesus Christ, Buddha, Krishna, Baha'ullah, Nanak Dev Ji, Rama&Sita and other great teachers, which have given us examples of pureness, honesty, believability, peace and common sense. As soon as man-made religious institutions have been built, the original teachings have been distorted for the sake of the institutions own power interests.
=============================================
A spiritual teaching is authentic until there is no big money or wealthy power involved. =============================================
2. This was not the case with Mohammedanism. The founder Muhammad who's first wifes 'Khadija' or 'Khadeejah' company name was Islam [which he inherited] until he got the idea with the religion and all the power and wealthy advantages coming along, so big money [business] and wealthy power has not only be involved since from the beginning, but has even been the basis for the whole story while his alleged "religion" contributed to the grow of his business and wealthy power, and was a demagogic justification tool for his unthinkable deeds, atrocities, wars of conquests, discriminations, subjugations, morders, beheading, stoning, threats, etc..
Muhammad said in this regard: "No property has ever been so useful to me as Khadijah's."
Therefore, the meaning of the Islamic Prophet's saying ... becomes clear: "Religion succeeded and became manifest only through Ali's sword and Khadijah's property."
About Mohammeds allegedly "holy defence wars":
Bukhari vol.3 book 37 ch.8 no.495 p.280 says, "When Allah made the prophet wealthy through conquests..." 1/5 of all spoils of war was put into treasury, and Sahih Muslim vol.2 book 5 ch.401 no.2348 p.519 says Mohammeds family had a share out of that.
=============================================
A spiritual teaching is authentic until there is no big money or wealthy power involved. =============================================
3. This was not the case with scientology founder Ron Hubbard, since money [and big business] was involved since from the beginning + even though no physical violence, hatred or discrimination has never been preached, there have been adopted psychological pressures on 'apostates'.
Conclusion: Islam and scientology are clearly NOT AUTHENTIC TEACHINGS since from the first moment on.
